Monday, December 21, 2015

Orwell's Animal Farm as a call to reading

Ever since I read George Orwell's Animal Farm, I've been handing it out to just about anyone I know who hasn't read it. Aside from its content, which is why I started recommending it to others, it’s also quite short and easily read, appealing qualities for non-readers or readers not used to fiction. 

In terms of content, while there are various takeaways one could get from the book, I believe one of them should be an urgent encouragement to read and constantly educate oneself. 
Let us review the events just enough to prove this point and not to spoil it on those who haven’t read it yet. In the beginning of the book, after the animals revolt, they take it on themselves to learn how to read. Some of them learn well and others find they cannot, no matter how hard they struggle. Those who master reading end up becoming the ruling class, whereas the various lesser abilities to read by the other animals determine how much they could be fooled and controlled. The other animals do not reach the level of the pigs, who are the only animals to master reading and writing in Animal Farm.

So those who can read fool those who cannot read. It is as if the author is warning us of the dangers of not learning by ourselves, as we end up being taken advantage of by those who know more. We often put our trust in those we think know more, and their interests may often come before ours. Think of religious clerics and secular intellectuals in our times who try to persuade people to blindly follow their causes, not always to the people’s benefit, but for some advantage that this intellectual class will benefit from.

Different media channels, each with their own agenda, present us with their own version of current events, how can one determine the truth, if that is at all possible? Orwell himself writes in his excellent essay, Notes on Nationalism: “Probably the truth is discoverable, but the facts will be so dishonestly set forth in almost any newspaper that the ordinary reader can be forgiven either for swallowing lies or for failing to form an opinion. The general uncertainty as to what is really happening makes it easier to cling to lunatic beliefs.”

The reading required here is not reading as leisure or as a hobby, it is a necessity if one does not want to be manipulated into an undesirable situation. Orwell writes in another essay: “To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.” What Orwell is writing of here specifically is seeing beyond our biases. Unlike propaganda and disinformation in general, these are internal problems that make us refuse to acknowledge unmistakable facts, or forget contradictory opinions we often hold. We may forget our own moral codes and laws simply by reversing a situation, by changing the sides involved in a conflict. For example, should we see a certain group of people we disapprove of for religious or political opinions being oppressed we find ourselves justifying it to the greatest extent, perhaps shifting all blame on the victims themselves, and should the situation be reversed we find ourselves appalled by the oppression and the justification that uses the same words we have used before. Try this as a thought experiment: replace the sides in any controversial event to see if your opinion of it stays the same.

Orwell recommends keeping a diary of one's opinions to keep track of these changes, reversals, and contradictions. I suppose in this day and age, many of us already record our opinions on the Internet, whether on Facebook, Twitter, or other social media websites. 

Returning to Orwell’s Animal Farm, I’ve started asking readers to imagine if they had to be a character in the book, who would they choose? Then I would ask them which character they thought came closest to representing them in reality.

The obvious answer is that no one would wish to be a character in Animal Farm, and the only way out of that is through constant and rigorous self-education. If you haven’t read it, don’t take my word for it, go read it for yourself.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

From Percy Shelley's Prometheus Unbound

To suffer woes which Hope thinks infinite; 
To forgive wrongs darker than death or night;
To defy Power, which seems omnipotent;
To love, and bear; to hope till Hope creates
From its own wreck the thing it contemplates;


- Percy Shelley

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Pain has an element of blank; 
It cannot recollect 
When it began, or if there was 
A time when it was not. 

It has no future but itself, 
Its infinite realms contain 
Its past, enlightened to perceive 
New periods of pain.

- Emily Dickinson 

Saturday, August 25, 2012

The Life of the Reader

I'm reading a reading, since every written work is a reading of some event or some idea, an imposed understanding of it which I then impose my own understanding on. If the author is not different in each instance of writing as is Foucault's argument, then at least the reader is most likely different in every reading instance. I am a different person with more experiences and probably a different set of ideas in mind as I read this book that I read previously, and I will be different if I read it again after some time.

Monday, June 11, 2012

The Trouble With Conspiracies

To make my point I'd like to start with an absurd example, and then move on to lesser idiotic ones.
Let's say someone named AbdulRahman, (choosing my own name so as not to offend anyone else), had a phobia of people named Ahmed. AbdulRahman is "Ahmedo-phobic". He absolutely mistrusts anyone named Ahmed, he is automatically suspicious when dealing with Ahmeds and believes them to be "bad" people. Now, AbdulRahman works in a company, and this company is looking for a new employee. AbdulRahman is part of a panel that interviews candidates for the job, one of whom is of course named Ahmed. As soon as he sees the name his guard is naturally up, and he is now looking for signs to discredit Ahmed. He will not readily admit to others that his reason for not trusting Ahmed is based purely on his name, because that's just insane. So he looks for other reasons to back his decision not to hire Ahmed. The company doesn't hire Ahmed in the end, because of AbdulRahman's manipulations. 
A few months later, AbdulRahman chances on an articles that talks about an incident regarding fraud, and the fraudster mentioned in the article is that very Ahmed that wasn't hired recently. AbdulRahman feels blessed, and more convinced about his phobia. He was right not to trust Ahmed.
But of course, he wasn't. Just in case you need me to make it clear, the reasoning behind not hiring Ahmed, behind not trusting Ahmed, was completely flawed. Stupid is too small a word for it.

Moving on to the less (but still) stupid and more realistic examples. Say AbdulRahman was a racist who didn't like black people. He rejected Ahmed because of his skin color and not because of his name, and later on felt more convinced about his racist belief when he discovered that Ahmed was indeed a thief. 
Of course, Ahmed being a thief is neither the result of his name nor his skin color. The reasoning is still erroneous, as most rational people would agree.

What is the problem here? AbdulRahman's racism or insane phobia is protecting him in this example from being conned. Yes, but that is merely by chance. His reasoning is completely flawed, it is not based at all on facts and logic, not based on the sayings and experiences of the person in front of him. It is based on entirely irrelevant traits.

This also works with ideological positions, and ideological "predispositions", as people of one ideology might be inclined not to trust people of an opposing ideology and judge based on that rather than a person's own merits. If AbdulRahman were a socialist with a disdain for capitalists, and Ahmed wasn't hired because of that, when Ahmed turns out to be a thief his views on economics are irrelevant. Conservatives and liberals, Sunnis and Shiites, the examples goes on. If you come up with a conspiracy theory based on your ideology, and you construct the facts based on a view you are ideologically predisposed to see, if the conspiracy turns out by chance accurate, it doesn't make your reasoning correct. 

If you're judging by ideology rather than by facts and logic, you're still like the AbdulRahman who hates all Ahmeds.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Excerpt from Brecht

Even anger against injustice
Makes the voice grow harsh. Alas, we
Who wished to lay the foundations of kindness
Could not ourselves be kind.



- Brecht

Saturday, January 7, 2012

First they came...

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.


- Martin Niemöller

Monday, December 26, 2011

Extract from Orwell's Notes on Nationalism

There is no crime, absolutely none, that cannot be condoned when 'our' side commits it. Even if one does not deny that the crime has happened, even if one knows that it is exactly the same crime as one has condemned in some other case, even if one admits in an intellectual sense that it is unjustified - still one cannot feel that it is wrong. Loyalty is involved, and so pity ceases to function.
- George Orwell 

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Dennis Hopper reading Kipling's If (1970)



I'd seen a more recent version of Dennis Hopper reading Kipling's If, and was looking for that when I came across this 1970 version.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Television, by Roald Dahl

The most important thing we've learned,
So far as children are concerned,
Is never, NEVER, NEVER let
Them near your television set --
Or better still, just don't install
The idiotic thing at all.
In almost every house we've been,
We've watched them gaping at the screen.
They loll and slop and lounge about,
And stare until their eyes pop out.
(Last week in someone's place we saw
A dozen eyeballs on the floor.)
They sit and stare and stare and sit
Until they're hypnotized by it,
Until they're absolutely drunk
With all that shocking ghastly junk.
Oh yes, we know it keeps them still,
They don't climb out the window sill,
They never fight or kick or punch,
They leave you free to cook the lunch
And wash the dishes in the sink --
But did you ever stop to think,
To wonder just exactly what
This does to your beloved tot?
IT ROTS THE SENSE IN THE HEAD!
IT KILLS IMAGINATION DEAD!
IT CLOGS AND CLUTTERS UP THE MIND!
IT MAKES A CHILD SO DULL AND BLIND
HE CAN NO LONGER UNDERSTAND
A FANTASY, A FAIRYLAND!
HIS BRAIN BECOMES AS SOFT AS CHEESE!
HIS POWERS OF THINKING RUST AND FREEZE!
HE CANNOT THINK -- HE ONLY SEES!
'All right!' you'll cry. 'All right!' you'll say,
'But if we take the set away,
What shall we do to entertain
Our darling children? Please explain!'
We'll answer this by asking you,
'What the darling ones used to do?
'How they kept themselves contented
Before this monster was invented?'
Have you forgotten? Don't you know?
We'll say it very loud and slow:
THEY ... USED ... TO ... READ! They'd READ and READ,
AND READ and READ, and then proceed
To READ some more. Great Scott! Gadzooks!
One half their lives was reading books!
The nursery shelves held books galore!
Books cluttered up the nursery floor!
And in the bedroom, by the bed,
More books were waiting to be read!
Oh, books, what books they used to know,
Those children living long ago!
So please, oh please, we beg, we pray,
Go throw your TV set away,
And in its place you can install
A lovely bookshelf on the wall.
Then fill the shelves with lots of books,
Ignoring all the dirty looks,
The screams and yells, the bites and kicks,
And children hitting you with sticks-
Fear not, because we promise you
That, in about a week or two
Of having nothing else to do,
They'll now begin to feel the need
Of having something to read.
And once they start -- oh boy, oh boy!
You watch the slowly growing joy
That fills their hearts. They'll grow so keen
They'll wonder what they'd ever seen
In that ridiculous machine,
That nauseating, foul, unclean,
Repulsive television screen!
And later, each and every kid
Will love you more for what you did.

Saturday, November 26, 2011

أصل كلمة كندورة

كندورة، كنادير: تعرف في المغرب العربي وإسبانيا باسم قندورة، تسمية شائعة منذ القرون الوسطى في عدة مصادر عربية وأجنبية، وأصلها فارسية: قنتوره أو كندوره. قنتوره بالفارسية تعني لباس ملون، أما كندوره تعني قطعة من الجلد كانت تلبس عند الأكل فتغطي الصدر وتنزل حتى الركبتين. انظر المعجم الفارسي دهخدا لغت نامه دهخدا مادة قر.
- من كتاب الملابس الشعبية في دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة. والشكر الجزيل لأخينا صقر المري الذي دلنا على هذه المعلومة.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

You Want a Social Life, with Friends - Kenneth Koch

You want a social life, with friends.
A passionate love life and as well
To work hard every day. What's true
Is of these three you may have two
And two can pay you dividends
But never may have three.

There isn't time enough, my friends--
Though dawn begins, yet midnight ends--
To find the time to have love, work, and friends.
Michelangelo had feeling
For Vittoria and the Ceiling
But did he go to parties at day's end?

Homer nightly went to banquets
Wrote all day but had no lockets
Bright with pictures of his Girl.
I know one who loves and parties
And has done so since his thirties
But writes hardly anything at all.


- Kenneth Koch

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Orwell on Nationalists

"The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them." - George Orwell